I had an AOL profile when I was in 8th grade. I got on facebook in college within a couple months of it being created. I started a blog and joined twitter. I think it’s safe to say that I enjoy the internet and social networking. But now there’s Google+.
As you’ll see in that link, Google+ is another company’s attempt to help people gather into groups and communicate on the internet. The idea is that it will be more personal than facebook and twitter, gathering your close friends into circles. I think it’s a cute concept. However, when I actually think about it, I don’t see it as useful at all. It hit me when I read in that article that friends can “share a piece of content, like a YouTube clip, and everyone in the Hangout can watch it together while talking about it.” Uh…
Here’s the problem. Things like email and facebook are great because we don’t have to be online at the same time as our friends to share or communicate. The beauty of email (and handwritten letters, for that matter) is the convenience of timing. If I wanted to “hang out” with my friends, I would not plan a time that we would all go online to do so. Maybe some people spend a lot of time on the computer for work or entertainment, but the odds that my friends are going to be on Google+ at the exact same time as each other are low. And this is the difference that I see between social networks and friendships.
I do not go on facebook to connect with my best friends. I already know what they’re up to because I talk to them or see them often enough. The 652 friends I have on facebook are spread out around the world, ranging from grade school classmates to people I met traveling in Asia. Facebook does not help me have friends; it’s a place for keeping track of people who you don’t totally want to lose touch with. It’s just a giant Rolodex with fun information and photos!
I also do not use twitter or my blog for friendship. I mostly follow people on twitter if they come up with interesting things to say about international education, the environment, or China. I try to post things on twitter and my blog that are interesting to people who are also passionate about these areas. I don’t expect everyone who reads my blog to be my friend.
I think Google+ is trying to make an online place more suited for friend groups. This is strange to me for two reasons. First, most people have an immediate group of friends who live near them and they see very often. I have a couple of groups of friends here in Pittsburgh who fit that description. But other than the fact that we all live in Pittsburgh, there is no other way that I can “group” them. And why would I waste time doing that online? If I want to see someone who lives a mile away, I pick up the phone and call them, or sometimes I even run into them on the street. When I move away from Pittsburgh, I will stay in close touch with some people, while others will just remain on my “don’t want to lose touch with you forever” list on facebook.
Second, most of my friends do not know many of my other friends. Every time I move, I have to explain to new groups of people why I have so many friends in St. Louis, Chicago, DC, Copenhagen, Beijing, and Pittsburgh. The network grows larger, but it also grows thinner. While I can connect a friend in China to a friend in Kansas based on some mutual interest, this is rare and usually temporary. This makes my groups of friends very fluid and random, not something I would need a website to keep track for me.
Maybe my opinions on this will change. I’ve only gotten to see tiny pieces of what Google+ looks like and how it functions. But overall, I see the effort to group your “friends” into “networks” as just a way to take time away from actually being with people. What makes me the most depressed is the idea that we aren’t walking around our neighborhoods chatting with people that we actually see in real life. Instead, Google+ wants to make it easier for us to start up conversations with people we see online:
“If your neighbor is sitting there, you know that they’ll likely be interested in striking up a conversation. In fact, it would be rude for you to walk by and not say anything. With that in mind, Google+ Hangout attempts to solve the social problem of video chat by making it easy for you to let others know that you’re interested in chatting.”
The comparison of a physical neighborhood to an online community is just creepy. I wish websites would stop trying to convince us of the twisted idea that we need to be online constantly in order to have friends. I think it’s exactly the opposite.










SocialVibe